Court Strikes Down Visa Ban for 75 Countries, but U.S. Pauses Immigrant Visa Interviews Worldwide. What’s Going On?

Over the past several days, several major developments have emerged concerning U.S. immigrant visas. First, a federal court found unlawful a policy that had effectively blocked the issuance of immigrant visas to nationals of 75 countries. Then, just days later, reports emerged of a temporary worldwide pause affecting certain immigrant visa interviews at U.S. consulates.

At first glance, these developments may seem contradictory. Here is what happened and what it means for applicants.

What Was the 75-Country Ban?

Beginning January 21, 2026, the U.S. Department of State paused the issuance of immigrant visas to nationals of 75 countries.

The list included, among others, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Georgia, Brazil, Colombia, Pakistan, and other countries.

The policy was primarily tied to concerns about public charge. The Department of State explained that it was reviewing screening procedures for applicants from countries it considered to present a higher risk of reliance on public benefits in the United States.

In practical terms, the administration’s position was that a person receiving an immigrant visa and moving to the United States should be financially self-sufficient and should not be likely to become a public charge, meaning someone who may become significantly dependent on government assistance.

It is important to understand that public charge is not a new rule. U.S. immigration law has long required an individualized assessment of an applicant, including factors such as financial circumstances, health, family situation, education, and other considerations.

The legal problem with the January policy was that, instead of an individualized assessment, nationals of 75 countries effectively faced a blanket restriction on immigrant visa issuance.

On August 21, the Court Found the Policy Unlawful

On August 21, 2026, U.S. District Judge Jeannette A. Vargas of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York vacated the policy. The case is Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. v. Rubio.

The court concluded that the Secretary of State had exceeded the authority granted by law.

Judge Vargas called the policy “patently unlawful” and explained that U.S. immigration law requires a consular officer to assess an applicant’s eligibility for a visa, including whether the public charge ground may apply, on an individualized basis. An entire category of applicants cannot simply be denied because of their nationality.

This was an important victory for applicants whose cases had been stopped solely because of the 75-country policy.

However, there is an important caveat.

Why Are People Now Talking About 52 Countries Instead of 75?

The repeal of the January policy does not mean that all other restrictions disappeared for nationals of all 75 countries.

Beginning January 21, 2026, the Department of State had paused immigrant visa issuance for nationals of 75 countries while reviewing rules related to public charge. The official list is available on the U.S. Department of State website.

At the same time, Presidential Proclamation 10998, which took effect on January 1, 2026, remains in force. It fully or partially restricts entry and visa issuance for nationals of 39 countries, as well as certain applicants using travel documents issued or endorsed by the Palestinian Authority.

A separate restriction applies to Turkmenistan: the issuance of immigrant visas is suspended, subject to specified exceptions.

Of the original 75 countries, 23 are also subject to Presidential Proclamation 10998:

Afghanistan, Antigua and Barbuda, Burma, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Dominica, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, The Gambia, Togo, and Yemen.

So while the court vacated the 75-country policy for all 75 countries, separate restrictions under Presidential Proclamation 10998 remain in place for nationals of those 23 countries.

In practical terms, this means that the removal of the January pause lifts that specific barrier for the remaining 52 countries. These include, for example, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Belarus.

It is important not to confuse the two measures: the 75-country policy was tied to public charge and was struck down by the court, while Presidential Proclamation 10998 is a separate presidential restriction that remains in effect.

Then Came Another Development: A Worldwide Pause

Almost immediately after the court ruling, another development emerged.

On August 25–26, media outlets including Reuters and the Financial Times reported that the Department of State had begun temporarily canceling or rescheduling immigrant visa interviews at U.S. embassies and consulates worldwide.

The reason is once again related to public charge.

According to Reuters, the Department of State is conducting additional global training for consular officers. The training is intended to ensure that officers assess applicants’ financial circumstances more consistently and evaluate whether they may become dependent on certain forms of government assistance after immigrating to the United States.

Some previously scheduled interviews have already been canceled or rescheduled. Applicants are being notified of changes, and new dates are expected to be provided later.

At this time, no single date has been announced for the full resumption of normal immigrant visa interview scheduling.

Does This Mean the United States Has Completely Stopped Immigration?

No. The new pause concerns immigrant visa interviews at U.S. embassies and consulates abroad, not all U.S. immigration processes.

Obtaining an immigrant visa through the U.S. Department of State and obtaining a green card through Adjustment of Status inside the United States are separate processes.

USCIS continues to operate inside the United States: at this time, there has been no announcement suspending the filing of I-130, I-140, or Adjustment of Status applications because of this new consular pause.

Adjustment of Status remains available to applicants who are in the United States and meet the requirements to file Form I-485.

What Matters Now

It is especially important not to draw conclusions about your own case based only on headlines. The new rules may affect someone waiting for a consular interview very differently from someone who has already filed an immigrant petition or is applying for a green card from inside the United States.

Each case needs to be evaluated individually.

If you would like to understand how these developments may affect your situation, you can schedule a strategy session with an immigration attorney at Bloomrich Law Firm. During the consultation, we will review your status, the current stage of your case, potential risks, and available next steps.

Book a strategy session

This material is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute individual legal advice.